PR-16

WSJF Finalised in DoD but WSJF Data Incomplete or Inconsistent

Planning Recommendations

Default severity: medium
PrioritizationProcessQualityRisk

What it detects

DoD checklist vs WSJF fields; tests; catalogue.

Detection formula

No published identification formula is available yet for this rule.

Examples in practice

  • A team shows dod checklist vs wsjf fields; tests; catalogue during analysis.
  • Example signal: DoD checklist vs WSJF fields; tests; catalogue.

Suggested response

Use the advisory outputs to tune refinement, WIP, and planning cadence with data.

Coaching playbook

Symptom

The "WSJF Finalised in DoD but WSJF Data Incomplete or Inconsistent" signal shows a repeatable delivery anti-pattern on the cited issues.

Why it matters

When "WSJF Finalised in DoD but WSJF Data Incomplete or Inconsistent" keeps appearing, the team is signalling a repeatable process gap. Left unexamined, the pattern hides where work really stalls and makes improvement metrics harder to trust.

What you can achieve

Use the advisory outputs to tune refinement, WIP, and planning cadence with data.

Facilitation questions

  • What system change would stop "WSJF Finalised in DoD but WSJF Data Incomplete or Inconsistent" from firing again?
  • What do the cited issues have in common — same root cause or same workaround?
  • Who owns the two-week experiment and how will we verify on the next import?

Run this rule against your own tracker data with Flow Analyzer.

Product tourSign in
PR-16: WSJF Finalised in DoD but WSJF Data Incomplete or Inconsistent — FlowAnalyzer