PL-05

WSJF or PI Baseline Changed After Planning Lock

Pipeline

Default severity: medium
ProcessOutputRisk

What it detects

WSJF/Tempo Account recalc after PI lock; tests; catalogue. AKVI-1530.

Detection formula

No published identification formula is available yet for this rule.

Examples in practice

  • A team shows wsjf/tempo account recalc after pi lock; tests; catalogue during analysis.
  • Example signal: WSJF/Tempo Account recalc after PI lock; tests; catalogue.

Suggested response

Unblock pre-release and carry-over items with clear ownership and planning labels.

Coaching playbook

Symptom

The "WSJF or PI Baseline Changed After Planning Lock" signal shows a repeatable delivery anti-pattern on the cited issues.

Why it matters

When "WSJF or PI Baseline Changed After Planning Lock" keeps appearing, the team is signalling a repeatable process gap. Left unexamined, the pattern hides where work really stalls and makes improvement metrics harder to trust.

What you can achieve

Unblock pre-release and carry-over items with clear ownership and planning labels.

Facilitation questions

  • What system change would stop "WSJF or PI Baseline Changed After Planning Lock" from firing again?
  • What do the cited issues have in common — same root cause or same workaround?
  • Who owns the two-week experiment and how will we verify on the next import?

Run this rule against your own tracker data with Flow Analyzer.

Product tourSign in
PL-05: WSJF or PI Baseline Changed After Planning Lock — FlowAnalyzer