FS-01

Dev lag

Flow Story

Default severity: medium
ProcessMetrics

What it detects

issue in development stages without correlated commit within threshold; tests; catalogue.

Detection formula

No published identification formula is available yet for this rule.

Examples in practice

  • A team shows issue in development stages without correlated commit within threshold; tests; catalogue during analysis.
  • Example signal: issue in development stages without correlated commit within threshold; tests; catalogue.

Suggested response

Review the observation details with the team and agree one concrete next step to reduce recurrence.

Coaching playbook

Symptom

The "Dev lag" signal shows a repeatable delivery anti-pattern on the cited issues.

Why it matters

When "Dev lag" keeps appearing, the team is signalling a repeatable process gap. Left unexamined, the pattern hides where work really stalls and makes improvement metrics harder to trust.

What you can achieve

Review the observation details with the team and agree one concrete next step to reduce recurrence.

Facilitation questions

  • What system change would stop "Dev lag" from firing again?
  • What do the cited issues have in common — same root cause or same workaround?
  • Who owns the two-week experiment and how will we verify on the next import?

Run this rule against your own tracker data with Flow Analyzer.

Product tourSign in
FS-01: Dev lag — FlowAnalyzer